|
The dogs in the study (n = 104) – comparison to registry data. |
||||
| Breeds1 |
Number of dogs |
Number in SBA-registry |
Proportion relative to SBA |
Ranking |
|
|
||||
| akita |
10 |
195 |
0.051 |
1 |
| standard poodle |
21 |
3439 |
0.006 |
2 |
| lhasa apso |
6 |
1062 |
0.006 |
3 |
| chow-chow |
3 |
688 |
0.004 |
4 |
| springer spaniel |
25 |
6308 |
0.004 |
5 |
| flatcoated retriever |
3 |
5837 |
0.0005 |
6 |
| Breeds1 |
Number of dogs |
Number of new registrations in SKK-registry |
Proportion relative to SKK |
Ranking |
| akita |
10 |
24 |
0.417 |
1 |
| lhasa apso |
6 |
166 |
0.036 |
2 |
| standard poodle |
21 |
651 |
0.032 |
3 |
| chow-chow |
3 |
103 |
0.029 |
4 |
| springer spaniel |
25 |
1139 |
0.022 |
5 |
| flatcoated retriever |
3 |
1188 |
0.003 |
6 |
|
1 = The six numerically most common breeds among the dogs in the study (n ≥ 3) | ||||
Hernblad Tevell et al. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 2008 50:11 doi:10.1186/1751-0147-50-11 |
||||