Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessResearch

Glutathione peroxidase (GPX) activity in blood of ewes on farms in different scrapie categories in Iceland

Kristín B Gudmundsdóttir1,4 email, Jakob Kristinsson2 email, Sigurdur Sigurdarson1,5 email, Tryggvi Eiríksson3 email and Torkell Jóhannesson2 email

1Chief Veterinary Office, Section for Animal Diseases, Institute for Experimental Pathology, University of Iceland, Keldur v/Vesturlandsveg, 110 Reykjavík, Iceland

2Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Institute of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Iceland, Hofsvallagata 53, 107 Reykjavík, Iceland

3Faculty of Natural Resources, Agricultural University of Iceland, Keldnaholt, 112 Reykjavík, Iceland

4Actavis Group, Clinical Research Department, Reykjavíkurvegur 80, 220 Hafnarfjördur, Iceland

5The Icelandic Food and Veterinary Authority, Austurvegur 64, 800 Selfoss, Iceland

author email corresponding author email

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 2008, 50:23doi:10.1186/1751-0147-50-23

Published: 23 June 2008

Abstract

Background

Preliminary studies indicated decreased glutathione peroxidase (GPX) activity in blood of ewes on scrapie-afflicted farms. Other studies have shown decreased GPX activity in brain of prion-infected mice and in prion-infected cells in vitro. The aim of this study was to examine the GPX activity in blood as well as the distribution of GPX-activity levels from ewes on farms in scrapie-afflicted areas in Iceland.

Methods

Blood samples were collected from 635 ewes (non-pregnant [n = 297] and pregnant [n = 338]) on 40 farms in scrapie-afflicted areas during the years 2001–2005, for analysis of GPX activity. The farms were divided into three categories: 1. Scrapie-free farms (n = 14); 2. Scrapie-prone farms (earlier scrapie-afflicted, restocked farms) (n = 12); 3. Scrapie-afflicted farms (n = 14). For comparison, 121 blood samples were also collected from non-pregnant ewes on one farm (farm A) in a scrapie-free area (scrapie never registered). Chi-square test was used to test for normal distribution of GPX-results, and Kruskal-Wallis test to compare GPX-results between categories.

Results

The GPX-results appeared to be biphasically distributed in ewes in all three scrapie categories and on farm A. The presumptive breaking point was about 300 units g Hb-1. About 30–50% of the GPX-results from ewes in all three scrapie categories were below 300 units g Hb-1 but only about 13% of the GPX-results from ewes on farm A. The mean GPX activity was highest on farm A, and was significantly lower on scrapie-prone farms than on scrapie-free or scrapie-afflicted farms (non-pregnant and pregnant ewes: P < 0.005, respectively; non-pregnant and pregnant ewes combined: P < 0.0005).

Conclusions

1) the distribution of GPX-results in blood of Icelandic ewes apparently has a biphasic character; 2) the GPX-results were higher in ewes on one farm in a scrapie-free area than in ewes on farms in the scrapie-afflicted areas; 3) GPX-activity levels were significantly lowest on earlier scrapie-afflicted, restocked farms, which might have a bearing on the recurrence of sporadic scrapie on these farms; 4) further study on the possible role of GPX activity in the occurrence of scrapie in Iceland is warranted.


© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.