<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>1751-0147-50-16</ui>
   <ji>1751-0147</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Review</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Reproductive biology of the pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>): a review</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1" ca="yes">
               <snm>Ungerfeld</snm>
               <fnm>Rodolfo</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>piub@internet.com.uy</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A2">
               <snm>Gonz&#225;lez-Pensado</snm>
               <fnm>Solana</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>solana@adinet.com.uy</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A3">
               <snm>Bielli</snm>
               <fnm>Alejandro</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <email>alejandro.bielli@gmail.com</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A4">
               <snm>Villagr&#225;n</snm>
               <fnm>Mat&#237;as</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>matias06@internet.com.uy</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A5">
               <snm>Olazabal</snm>
               <fnm>Daniel</fnm>
               <insr iid="I1"/>
               <email>neurolazabal@hotmail.com</email>
            </au>
            <au id="A6">
               <snm>P&#233;rez</snm>
               <fnm>William</fnm>
               <insr iid="I2"/>
               <email>vetanat@gmail.com</email>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1">
               <p>Departamento de Fisiolog&#237;a, Facultad de Veterinaria, Montevideo, Uruguay</p>
            </ins>
            <ins id="I2">
               <p>Departamento de Morfolog&#237;a y Desarrollo, Facultad de Veterinaria, Montevideo, Uruguay</p>
            </ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica</source>
         <issn>1751-0147</issn>
         <pubdate>2008</pubdate>
         <volume>50</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <fpage>16</fpage>
         <url>http://www.actavetscand.com/content/50/1/16</url>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubidlist>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">18534014</pubid>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1751-0147-50-16</pubid>
            </pubidlist>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <rec>
            <date>
               <day>13</day>
               <month>5</month>
               <year>2008</year>
            </date>
         </rec>
         <acc>
            <date>
               <day>05</day>
               <month>6</month>
               <year>2008</year>
            </date>
         </acc>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>05</day>
               <month>6</month>
               <year>2008</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
      <cpyrt>
         <year>2008</year>
         <collab>Ungerfeld et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab>
         <note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note>
      </cpyrt>
      <abs>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Abstract</p>
            </st>
            <p>The pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>) is a South American grazing deer which is in extreme danger of extinction. Very little is known about the biology of the pampas deer. Moreover, most information has not been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and is only available in local publications, theses, etc. Therefore, our aim was to update and summarize the available information regarding the reproductive biology of the pampas deer. Moreover, in most sections, we have also included new, unpublished information. Detailed descriptions are provided of the anatomy of both the female and the male reproductive tract, puberty onset, the oestrous cycle and gestational length. Birthing and the early postpartum period are described, as are maternal behaviour and early fawn development, seasonal distribution of births, seasonal changes in male reproduction and antler cycle, reproductive behaviour, semen collection, and cryopreservation. Finally, an overview is given and future directions of research are proposed.</p>
         </sec>
      </abs>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Background</p>
         </st>
         <p>The pampas deer, <it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus </it>(Linnaeus, 1758), used to be a widespread species originally distributed in the open grasslands (pampas and savannas) in eastern South America, from 5&#176; to 41&#176; S <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>. In the 1800s naturalists and voyagers reported great abundance of this species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>. It was the most widespread cervid in Uruguay <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>. Reports of explorers and pioneer settlers as well as the folklore clearly tell how the pampas deer could be found in larger groups throughout the grasslands during the 17<sup>th </sup>and 18<sup>th </sup>centuries. Even place names in the region bear witness to the widespread distribution of this species. Some records report that more than 2,300,000 deer skins were exported during the 19<sup>th </sup>century from the R&#237;o de la Plata <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, due to man's direct and indirect influence the population has decreased substantially in both size and distribution. This decrement has been explained by habitat fragmentation, agricultural development and competition with farmed animals <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp>, unregulated hunting <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp> and transmission of infectious diseases <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>Over the past few decades, the isolation of the few remaining populations has pushed this species to the brink of extinction. Small populations have been reported in Argentina (Bah&#237;a Samboromb&#243;n <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>, Corrientes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>, San Luis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp>, Santa F&#233; <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>), Brazil <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr></abbrgrp> and Uruguay <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp>. Although small populations were reported some years ago in Bolivia <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr></abbrgrp>, no up-to-date data about them have been reported. Overall, the pampas deer is considered in extreme danger of extinction. It has been listed in Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr></abbrgrp> since 1975, and is considered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (UICN) as being in critical danger of extinction <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr></abbrgrp>. The biggest known semi-captive population, made up of approximately 80 individuals (2008), has been bred for the last 25 years at the Estaci&#243;n de Cr&#237;a de Fauna Aut&#243;ctona (ECFA), Pan de Az&#250;car, Uruguay (33&#176;47' S, 54&#176;00' W) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         <p>In spite of the fact that this is an endangered species, very little is known about the biology of the pampas deer. Moreover, most information has not been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and is only available in local publications, theses, etc. Therefore, our aim was to update and summarize the available information regarding the reproductive biology of the pampas deer, including female and male anatomy, puberty and seasonal reproductive patterns, maternal and sexual-related behaviours and reproductive techniques. New, unpublished information on all these areas will also be included.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>General description of the species</p>
         </st>
         <p>Until recently, only three subspecies of the pampas deer were recognized: <it>O. bezoarticus bezoarticus</it>, occurring in Brazil, <it>O. bezoarticus celer</it>, in Argentina, and <it>O. bezoarticus leucogaster</it>, in southwestern Brazil, northeastern Argentina (Corrientes) and southeastern Bolivia <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp>. Cabrera <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp> and Jackson <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp> were unable to describe the taxonomic characteristics of the Uruguayan populations. The existence of two different subspecies endemic in Uruguay, <it>O. bezoarticus arerunguaensis </it>(Salto, northwestern Uruguay) and <it>O. bezoarticus uruguayensis </it>(Sierra de Ajos, Rocha, southeastern Uruguay), was described based on cytogenetics and molecular <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp> and morphometric <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp> data.</p>
         <p>Pampas deer males are somewhat bigger than females <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>. Free-ranging males reach a length of 130 cm (muzzle tip to tail base), measuring 75 cm at shoulder height and having a tail length of 15 cm. They weigh approximately 35 kg. However, data obtained from animals bred in semi-captivity indicate slightly smaller animals, with males measuring approximately 90&#8211;100 cm long, shoulder height 65&#8211;70 cm, and weighing 30&#8211;35 kg. Antlers are middle-sized when compared with other deer, solid and thin. Antlers reach 30 cm long, have three points, a brow point and a rear, and a longer bifurcated branch <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>. Females reach 85 cm length and 65 cm at shoulder height, with their body weight being 20&#8211;25 kg (unpublished data). Males are usually darker coated than females <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Female reproduction</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Anatomy of the female reproductive tract</p>
            </st>
            <p>The main characteristics of the pampas deer reproductive tract have not been previously described. In this section we present the main anatomical characteristics of tracts obtained from six dead females (<it>O. bezoarticus arerunguaensis</it>). Three of them were prepubertal; the other three were adults that died during the spring at the ECFA, Uruguay. Anatomical terms are used according to the Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>The female genital organs of <it>O. bezoarticus </it>are located inside the pelvic cavity. These organs are small in relation to body size when compared with other cervids, such as the Pere David's deer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>. Overall, considering the vagina, cervix, corpus and cornua uteri, the tract is elongated (Fig. <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). The same parts as described for domestic ruminants are recognized <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>. Ovaries measure approximately 1.0 &#215; 0.6 &#215; 0.5 cm, and each ovary weighs 0.5 g, with no differences between the right and left ovary. In the ovaries studied no corpus luteum was visible.</p>
            <fig id="F1">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 1</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Overview of the female reproductive tract of the pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>)</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p>
                     <b>Overview of the female reproductive tract of the pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>).</b>
                  </p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1751-0147-50-16-1"/>
            </fig>
            <p>The uterine tubes are fairly flexuous, and run together within the mesosalpinx at about 0.5 cm from its free border. The ovarian fimbriae, infundibulum, ampulla and isthmus are clearly differentiated. Between the ampulla and the isthmus the tract narrows in diameter. Colour intensity decreases markedly along the uterine tubes, the distal end being much paler.</p>
            <p>The uterus comprises the cervix, corpus and cornua. The uterus is bicornuated, with tapering proximal ends of the cornua. Unlike those in domestic ruminants, the cornua uteri are not spiralled, and are directed laterally, with a slight ventral incurvation. Both cornua measure 3.0&#8211;4.0 cm long. The uterus does not present an intercornual ligament, which distinguishes it from that in domestic ruminants. Each uterine cornu harbours four caruncles aligned in two rows.</p>
            <p>Distally, the cornua join together along a length of 1.0 cm, and look like a long corpus uteri. There are no caruncles in the corpus. The length of the corpus uteri is approximately 4.5 cm and its lumen is continuous cranially with the lumina of the cornua uteri through two discrete openings. The cervix is a firm tube that can readily be distinguished by palpation of the isolated reproductive tract from both the softer corpus uteri cranially and the vagina caudally. The cervix is 4.0 cm long, and 1.0 cm in diameter. Four circular folds project into the cervical canal (Fig. <figr fid="F2">2</figr>). These folds vary in height and length, and are annulus-shaped. The most cranial fold is not as well developed as the other three.</p>
            <fig id="F2">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 2</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Circular folds projecting from the cervix into the cervical canal</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p>
                     <b>Circular folds projecting from the cervix into the cervical canal.</b>
                  </p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1751-0147-50-16-2"/>
            </fig>
            <p>No vaginal part of the cervix can be distinguished. The vagina and vestibule are similar to those in small domestic ruminants. The vaginal mucosa forms longitudinal folds. The vulvar labia and the clitoris are not prominent. Overall, the anatomy of the female reproductive tract differs in some important respects, as reduced uterine length, uterine tubes flexuosity and small ovaries, from that of domestic ruminants.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Puberty, oestrous cycle and gestational length</p>
            </st>
            <p>Few data are available on age of puberty in female pampas deer. Hinds born at the ECFA gave birth for the first time at approximately 21 months. If we consider that gestational length is probably no longer than 7&#8211;7.5 months (see below), the first fertile oestrus of hinds born at the ECFA is therefore at the age of no more than 14 months. We also observed a delay in age at first parturition in females originally captured from the wild. This was probably a consequence of the stress of capture, weaning and transportation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>There are no direct data regarding oestrous cycle length. Gonz&#225;lez-Sierra <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp> has suggested that cycle length is approximately 21 days, but presents no information on how those data were obtained (i.e. number of animals studied, method of recording oestrous behaviour, etc).</p>
            <p>The gestational period in the species has been reported to be "a little longer than 7 months" <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr></abbrgrp>. Other authors agree that gestational length is between 7 and 7.5 months <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, such data have been calculated in wild populations after roughly recording the period during which more sexual activity is observed and the period of the year in which more newborns are observed. As individual data are not available, this should be considered a general trend.</p>
            <p>In other cervids, gestational length varies widely according to environmental conditions <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr></abbrgrp>. We expect that gestational length in the pampas deer may be even shorter than 7 months, according to some previous observations at the ECFA <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, we should consider that at the ECFA, animals receive enough food throughout the year, including the gestational period. Therefore, if gestational length varies in pampas deer in relation to food availability, perhaps the gestational length at the ECFA is shorter than in wild populations.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Birth and the early postpartum period</p>
            </st>
            <p>Some deer, such as the white-tailed deer, can have twins or even triplets <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, like red deer and some other species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr></abbrgrp>, pampas deer generally deliver just one fawn <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr></abbrgrp>. A fawn's body weight at birth is approximately 2 kg <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>. At least under semi-captive conditions the body weight at birth is similar between male and female fawns, and is not influenced by season, mother's parity, or time since the previous parturition <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>. Delivery of twins was seen once <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>, but both fawns died immediately after birth. At Emas National Park, in Goi&#225;s, Brazil (18&#176;S/52&#176;W), Redford <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr></abbrgrp> observed one female with two similar-sized young.</p>
            <p>The sex ratio at birth is close to 1:1 in pampas deer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, some authors observed male:female ratios from 1:1.1 to 1:2 in adults <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B36">36</abbr></abbrgrp>, which suggests different mortality rates from birth to adulthood. Clutton-Brock et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B37">37</abbr></abbrgrp> observed a relationship between female parity, as well as date of parturition <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B37">37</abbr></abbrgrp>, and sex ratio in offspring of red deer. Gaillard et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B38">38</abbr></abbrgrp> did not find any difference in birth date at the year between the sexes in roe deer, suggesting that the sex ratio in pampas deer is more similar to that in roe deer than in red deer. An alternative explanation is that Clutton-Brock et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B37">37</abbr></abbrgrp> studied red deer in wild populations, while our study was done in a semi-captive population in which there are no changes in food availability throughout the year. Therefore, environmental pressures may have a stronger effect on the reproduction of these wild populations, differently affecting males and females.</p>
            <p>One or two days before calving, pregnant females become restless and may start walking constantly, which has been reported in other deer species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>. We observed that this period is also characterized by the elevation of the tail and losses of amniotic and birth fluids. Parturition occurs approximately 45&#8211;90 minutes after the initial leaking of birth fluids. During this time the hind is commonly seen repeatedly lying down and standing up, isolated from the rest of the group (unpublished data). As in other "hider" species of deer, the parturient female looks for and chooses a hidden and isolated place to lie down and deliver. Foetal forelegs appear visible in the doe's genitals approximately 1 hour before birth, at which time the hind is still walking and lying down repeatedly. As the intensity of the contractions increases, the hind lies down to deliver and the calf is born after approximately 15 minutes [Moore and M&#252;ller-Schwartze, unpublished draft available from the authors, <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr></abbrgrp>].</p>
            <p>We have observed females standing up before the complete delivery of the fawn. Immediately after parturition, the mother intensively and continuously licks the fawn, eating all the amnion that surround it <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp>, similarly to what has been described in other deer species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>. The placenta is released 1 hour after the fawn is born, and is also eaten <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr></abbrgrp>. The hind pulls the placenta out of her reproductive tract with her teeth and starts eating it before it is completely expelled (unpublished observations). During parturition it is not unusual to see other females approaching the parturient hind to smell the amniotic fluid and membranes extruding from her genitals, indicating the attraction that these fluids have for other members of the herd <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Maternal behaviour and early fawn development</p>
            </st>
            <p>Almost immediately after birth, the fawn moves its tongue out of its mouth and makes head movements similar to those performed while searching for the udder. The fawn starts suckling 30&#8211;60 minutes after birth and also stands up at approximately that time. However, as in many other deer species, standing is not necessary for starting to suckle as the mother usually lies next to the fawn, and can start nursing it in this position. Pampas deer fawns can move from the site of birth, before standing up, by kicking the ground with their legs. When they do the mother follows the newborn and keeps licking it. The mother stays close to or lies at the birth site during the first hours after parturition and maintains frequent contact with the newborn.</p>
            <p>While nursing, the mother licks the fawn, in particular its perianal region, stimulating urination and defaecation. During this initial time, mother and fawn learn to recognize each other. Although the establishment of a bond and recognition in this species has not been studied in detail, olfactory cues and vocalizations are probably critical, as in other deer species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr><abbr bid="B40">40</abbr></abbrgrp>. After having nursed the fawn for a short time the mother can leave the area of calving. Deer fawns hide and spend most of their first day of life separated from their mothers, who nurse them for just a few minutes during the first few postnatal days. Then, depending on the deer species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp>, either the calf follows the mother (e.g. in reindeer) or the mother visits the site where the calf is hidden two to three times a day (red and pampas deer). In pampas deer, the encounters between the mother and the fawn change significantly over time. At least in semi-captive animals, during the first 2 weeks postpartum, the mother visits the site where the fawn is hidden, and calls it to attract it. Older fawns increase the frequency of searches for their mother in order to start nursing. Even so, fawns will continue emitting high-pitched vocalizations to call the mother to the place where they are hidden.</p>
            <p>The mother hind calls the fawn by repeated brief, low-pitched vocalizations. In response to these calls, the fawn stands up without vocalizing during the first days postpartum. Part of the process of reciprocal recognition by the mother and fawn includes smelling each other, and making snout contact. The fawn emits high-pitched vocalizations when at risk, increasing the arousal of the herd. In such cases only the mother will approach in response to the alert call. Although reciprocal recognition between mother and offspring, as in other ungulates (e.g. sheep), is well developed in most deer species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B40">40</abbr></abbrgrp>, allosuckling, and allomothering or adoption are not uncommon in fallow and red deer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B41">41</abbr><abbr bid="B42">42</abbr></abbrgrp>. Therefore, fawns that do not receive enough milk from their mothers will usually look for milk from other lactating females. We do not know how common allosuckling or adoption is in pampas deer, but at least on one occasion we observed one fawn suckling for a short time from a different mother, simultaneously with her own fawn.</p>
            <p>Deer fawns usually stay hidden but by 2&#8211;3 weeks of age they can run and play. At 4 weeks of age, they already graze but stay close to their mother most of the time. Weaning occurs at approximately 4 months of age <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, in semi-captive individuals we observed that the time spent suckling in relation to total feeding time decreases at 3&#8211;6 weeks of age (Fig. <figr fid="F3">3</figr>). Beyond this period of maternal dependence, the mother and fawn keep a close relationship, showing affiliative behaviour such as mutual licking for several years. When a second fawn is born this relationship reduces in intensity and the mother starts rejecting the older fawn.</p>
            <fig id="F3">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 3</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Percentage of time spent suckling in relation to total feeding time (grazing, eating ration, leaves, or water abbreviating)</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Percentage of time spent suckling in relation to total feeding time (grazing, eating ration, leaves, or water abbreviating).</b> Behaviour of 18 fawns was recorded during 2 hours per week (1 hour in the morning and 1 in the afternoon) at the ECFA (unpublished data).</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1751-0147-50-16-3"/>
            </fig>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Male reproduction</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Anatomy of the male reproductive tract</p>
            </st>
            <p>The following description corresponds to four males (<it>O. bezoarticus arerunguaensis</it>) which died from natural causes at the ECFA in Uruguay. Their general anatomy is similar to that described for other deer species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B43">43</abbr></abbrgrp>. The prepuce and scrotum (Fig. <figr fid="F4">4</figr>) are covered with fine hairs. As in the female, two pairs of nipples are located on either side of the prepuce. The prepuce is a single fold consisting of external and internal laminae. The penis has a radix, corpus and glans. Its radix attaches to the ischial arches by two rounded crura. The penis is fibro-elastic, with no sigmoid flexure. The urethra is surrounded by a thin corpus spongiosum composed of erectile tissue, almost to the terminal external orifice. The unpigmented scrotum is attached near the body in the inguinal region, covered by the thighs. The deferent ducts are united by a genital fold containing blood vessels. The testis, epididymis and spermatic cord in a prepubertal male are presented in Figure <figr fid="F5">5</figr>.</p>
            <fig id="F4">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 4</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Prepuce and scrotum in male pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>)</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p>
                     <b>Prepuce and scrotum in male pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>).</b>
                  </p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1751-0147-50-16-4"/>
            </fig>
            <fig id="F5">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 5</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Testis, epididymis and spermatic cord of a prepubertal pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>)</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p>
                     <b>Testis, epididymis and spermatic cord of a prepubertal pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>).</b>
                  </p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1751-0147-50-16-5"/>
            </fig>
            <p>The following sex glands can be recognized: the ampullae of the deferent ducts, the vesicular glands, the prostate and the bulbo-urethral glands. However, a well-defined corpus of the prostate is not observed.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Male sexual development</p>
            </st>
            <p>Very little is known regarding male reproductive physiology in pampas deer. Male sexual development in pampas deer is mainly known from studies of antler development. During their first months, male fawns grow small, single-spiked, 2&#8211;8 cm long antlers (observations made at the ECFA, 2007). According to Whitehead <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B44">44</abbr></abbrgrp>, this phenomenon is uncommon in cervids, being described for some few species such as roe deer (<it>Capreolus capreolus</it>) and reindeer (<it>Rangifer tarandus</it>), and having been noted in <it>O. bezoarticus </it>in captivity in Berlin Zoo <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr></abbrgrp>. Preliminary observations from the ECFA report that fawns that were born in spring are not sexually mature by the following autumn. However, these individuals do show agonistic behaviour towards other males when 1 year old, i.e. by late spring. Moreover, according to Gonz&#225;lez-Sierra <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp>, 1-year-old males show an interest in females during their second summer of life. We have also observed display of male courtship behaviour in 5&#8211;6-month-old males. However, it is difficult to determine whether this corresponds to playing or sexual behaviour. Therefore, puberty probably occurs at approximately 1 year of age.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Seasonal reproductive pattern</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Seasonal distribution of births</p>
            </st>
            <p>It is well known that environmental conditions may importantly influence the reproductive strategies of ungulates <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B45">45</abbr><abbr bid="B46">46</abbr><abbr bid="B47">47</abbr><abbr bid="B48">48</abbr></abbrgrp>. Deer show seasonal reproductive patterns, although reproductive strategies to synchronize parturition with best survival probability may differ among deer species, as happens with most ungulates. Parturition in temperate climate species (e.g. mule deer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B49">49</abbr></abbrgrp>, Eld's deer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B50">50</abbr></abbrgrp>, musk deer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B51">51</abbr></abbrgrp>, P&#232;re David's deer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B52">52</abbr></abbrgrp>, red deer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr></abbrgrp> and roe deer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B38">38</abbr></abbrgrp>) occurs in spring-summer. Seasonal reproductive patterns of wild ruminants may be influenced by photoperiod <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B53">53</abbr></abbrgrp>, population density <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B54">54</abbr></abbrgrp>, short <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B55">55</abbr></abbrgrp> or long-term <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B47">47</abbr></abbrgrp> effects of climate, physical condition during the rutting period <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B46">46</abbr></abbrgrp>, plant phenology <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B56">56</abbr></abbrgrp>, or socio-sexual stimuli <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B57">57</abbr><abbr bid="B58">58</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>In pampas deer, fawning periods seem to vary according to subspecies and location (see Table 1 in Merino et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B59">59</abbr></abbrgrp>) although all reports show a peak in fawn births beginning in August-October (southern hemisphere spring equinox: late September). In general terms, it can be said that in pampas deer populations inhabiting subtropical to temperate locations (<it>O. bezoaorticus celer </it>in Buenos Aires Province, in Argentina, and <it>O. bezoarticus arerunguaensis </it>and <it>O. bezoarticus uruguayensis </it>in southeastern Uruguay), births can occur all year round, and the fawning peak falls either in spring (Uruguay) or in late spring to late summer/early autumn (Buenos Aires Province, Argentina), roughly coinciding with pasture abundance peaks. The population in San Luis, Argentina (66&#176;00' 34&#176; 22'S), at the southwestern limit of the pampas deer range, inhabit dry grasslands with an average rainfall of 450 mm, 80% of which falls during October-April, a shade maximum temperature of 40&#176;C in the summer and a winter minimum of -15&#176;C <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B60">60</abbr></abbrgrp>. Interestingly, the San Luis population (<it>O. bezoarticus celer</it>) which occur nearly exactly at the same latitude as the population in southeastern Uruguay, but in a semi-arid, continental climate, have a shorter fawning peak in spring. Furthermore, the fawning period does not extend through the year, but extends from late winter to late summer/early autumn. On the other hand, <it>O. bezoarticus bezoarticus </it>inhabit Cerrado do Pantanal region in Brazil, under tropical conditions where food availability varies more markedly than in the abovementioned habitats, due to sharp differences between the rainy and dry season. Consequently, the fawning period does not extend through the year, but is limited to July-November, with a peak in August-September, which coincides with the beginning of the rainy season.</p>
            <p>Redford <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr></abbrgrp> has suggested that pampas deer are similar to axis deer in not having a defined rutting season. However, most data suggest that although the seasonality is not as strong as in other deer species (e.g. white-tailed, roe or red deer), there are differences in the frequency of births observed throughout the year, suggesting an extended reproductive season and a high plasticity to respond to short-term signals. Moreover, food supply seems to be an important regulator of seasonality also in pampas deer. In captive pampas deer taken from Paraguay to Germany (Berlin Zoo, 52&#176;30' N), Fr&#228;drich <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr></abbrgrp> reported no fixed rutting season, although males presented an annual antler cycle. However, how transportation and adaptation to a new environment with inverse seasons (due to the change of hemisphere) affected seasonality in that population remains unknown. We have analysed the distribution of 272 births that occurred during 20 years in a semi-captive population of pampas deer in Uruguay (34&#176;3' S), where animals receive the same amount of food throughout the year <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>. Although births were observed every month, the distribution through the year suggests the existence of a seasonal reproductive pattern (Fig. <figr fid="F6">6</figr>). The seasonal pattern seems to be less rigid in semi-captive conditions than in wild populations from similar latitudes, suggesting that food availability has a direct influence on cyclic activity.</p>
            <fig id="F6">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 6</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Monthly distribution of birth percentages in a herd of semi-captive pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>) at the ECFA, Pan de Az&#250;car, in southern Uruguay, in a pool of 272 births recorded over 20 years</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Monthly distribution of birth percentages in a herd of semi-captive pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>) at the ECFA, Pan de Az&#250;car, in southern Uruguay, in a pool of 272 births recorded over 20 years.</b> Grey areas correspond to autumn and spring. Adapted from Ungerfeld et al. [19].</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1751-0147-50-16-6"/>
            </fig>
            <p>In our population at the ECFA we also observed that the parturition of primiparous females is more concentrated than parturitions of multiparous females <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>. Similar to many wild mammals <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B61">61</abbr><abbr bid="B62">62</abbr><abbr bid="B63">63</abbr><abbr bid="B64">64</abbr></abbrgrp>, the age at first mating (primiparous females) is influenced by a body mass threshold, which is less limiting for multiparous females. Therefore, as is the case with roe deer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B65">65</abbr></abbrgrp>, red deer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B66">66</abbr></abbrgrp>, Alaskan moose <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B47">47</abbr></abbrgrp> and Alaskan caribou <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B46">46</abbr></abbrgrp>, growth may be a major determinant of primiparity in pampas deer as females need to reach a threshold body mass to become pregnant. Since in the ECFA population, food is supplied in similar amounts throughout the year, it seems that photoperiod has a stronger effect on puberty attainment than on the cyclic activity of adult females. This difference in seasonal effects between pubertal and adult females is in agreement with the differences found in males between first antler cycle and the adult antler cycle.</p>
            <p>Taking into consideration all this information, the pampas deer seems to be a seasonal breeder, with most parturitions occurring during spring, but with breeding activity possibly occurring throughout the year. There seems to be a photoperiod-induced seasonal cycle, which is strongly influenced by pasture availability.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Seasonality in males</p>
            </st>
            <p>The male reproductive cycle of cervids in temperate latitudes is well known. These species are markedly seasonal, with important changes in antler cycle, neck musculature and testicular size and histology in the male <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B67">67</abbr><abbr bid="B68">68</abbr></abbrgrp>. Pampas deer males seem to be moderately seasonal. Given that at the ECFA, births have been recorded all year round (see above), it can be inferred that at least some males also breed all year round. However, a rutting season has been recognized in pampas deer from both Uruguay and Brazil. In Uruguay, the rutting season corresponds to February-April, and is defined as the period when male sparring and fighting is most frequently seen.</p>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Antler cycle</p>
               </st>
               <p>As in other deer species, antlers are renewed every year. Undoubtedly, yearly antler renewal implies a high energy cost for males. Antler cycle is influenced by testicular androgen secretion <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B69">69</abbr></abbrgrp>. In turn, this is influenced by photoperiod, melatonin and prolactin secretion <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B70">70</abbr><abbr bid="B71">71</abbr></abbrgrp>. Moreover, antler cycle is also influenced by nutrition, age, presence of parasites, and illness <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B72">72</abbr></abbrgrp>. Antlers are cast from March to May at Emas National Park, with antlers in velvet starting to appear in April. Antler growth takes 30&#8211;45 days [<abbrgrp><abbr bid="B73">73</abbr></abbrgrp>; Gonz&#225;lez-Pensado &amp; Villagr&#225;n, unpublished data], with maximal velvet presence during June and July and velvet shedding in August <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B74">74</abbr></abbrgrp>. Jackson &amp; Langguth <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp> report that in San Boromb&#243;n, Argentina, over 85% of males were in hard antler between January and July. Conversely, from August to November 70% of the males were in velvet. The breeding season coincides with hard antlers and males with antlers in velvet are likely to be less active <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B75">75</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
               <p>In San Luis, Argentina, antlers are normally cast in August-September, towards the end of the southern winter. Antler regeneration starts immediately and by October-November all bucks are in velvet. The new antlers are generally full-sized and clean by December. In a recent study in the region, during February-April, which corresponds to the height of the rut, all 24 bucks studied had polished antlers. Rutting activity is concentrated in, but is not exclusive to, late summer and autumn <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B76">76</abbr></abbrgrp>. Factors such as nutrition, age, presence of parasites, diseases and wounds may all influence antler cycle timing <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B77">77</abbr></abbrgrp>. The San Luis data show a similar timing to that described by Jackson &amp; Langguth <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp> for the eastern groups of <it>O. bezoarticus celer</it>, with the major events in the cycle occurring about 1 month ahead of those reported for the region by Bianchini &amp; P&#233;rez <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B78">78</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
               <p>In La Corona and Bah&#237;a de Samboromb&#243;n, in Buenos Aires Province in Argentina, the majority of males are in hard antler from November-December through to July <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B79">79</abbr></abbrgrp>. Antlers are cast around July and are cleaned of velvet by the end of the year. Bianchini &amp; P&#233;rez <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B78">78</abbr></abbrgrp> concluded that in La Corona and Campos del Tuy&#250;, shedding takes place between June and September, younger animals being the first to lose their antlers. During October, November and December, all deer are in velvet, which is stripped by late January/early February, with the antler cycle being 1 month later than reported by Jackson &amp; Langguth <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>. Climatic conditions in Sierra de los Ajos, Rocha, Uruguay, are similar to those in Buenos Aires Province in Argentina <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B80">80</abbr></abbrgrp>. All males there are in hard antler until July and antlers are shed in August. Antler growth begins quickly thereafter. Antlers are in velvet until November (with 50% of antlers in velvet, and 50% of antlers being hard during November). In December, all males are in hard antler.</p>
               <p>Recent detailed data on 22 bucks and 72 antler cycles have been obtained in Uruguay at the ECFA <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B81">81</abbr></abbrgrp>. The mean date of the first casting of antlers was 4 August (i.e. mid-winter). The brow and the trez tine were first observed 22.8 &#177; 0.6 and 45.9 &#177; 0.9 days after the first antler casting. Velvet shedding was observed 103.3 &#177; 2.1 days after the first antler casting. Both antler castings were observed later in first-antler cycle bucks than in adult bucks, although the interval between both castings was not different. The interval from the brow tine observation to the trez tine observation was reported to be shorter in first-antler cycle bucks than in adults. As in other deer species, the antler cycle was reported to be seasonal, but unlike most deer species, cycle to cycle antler growth persisted well into adulthood. Figure <figr fid="F7">7</figr> summarizes the antler cycle through the year in adult and yearling males.</p>
               <fig id="F7">
                  <title>
                     <p>Figure 7</p>
                  </title>
                  <caption>
                     <p>Antler cycle in adult and yearling pampas deer males</p>
                  </caption>
                  <text>
                     <p><b>Antler cycle in adult and yearling pampas deer males.</b> Adapted from Ungerfeld et al. [83].</p>
                  </text>
                  <graphic file="1751-0147-50-16-7"/>
               </fig>
            </sec>
            <sec>
               <st>
                  <p>Seasonal changes in male reproduction</p>
               </st>
               <p>In Brazil at Emas National Park, <it>O. bezoarticus bezoarticus </it>displays a biannual cycle in testosterone faecal concentration, with a summer peak corresponding to the major rutting season and another peak observed in winter-spring, which is a period of antler mineralization and velvet shedding. Semen quality in <it>O. bezoarticus bezoarticus </it>in Brazil (at Pantanal Matogrossense and Emas National Park) was reported to be regular in February but of low quality in July and September <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B82">82</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, one out of six animals studied, having antlers in velvet, produced good quality semen in July.</p>
               <p>Reproductive behaviour has been correlated to testosterone faecal concentration in <it>O. bezoarticus bezoarticus </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B74">74</abbr></abbrgrp>. There are two peaks in reproductive activity, in December-January (summer) and in July-September (winter-spring). Anogenital and urine sniffing, flehmen, chasing, fighting and mounting are the prevailing behaviours of the first peak, while gland marking is the most frequently observed behaviour during the second peak. Conversely, mean group size is highest in September (4.2 animals/group), with the lowest means in October-February (mean range 1.7&#8211;2.7 animals/group) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B74">74</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            </sec>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Reproductive behaviour</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Courtship behaviour</p>
            </st>
            <p>The most complete description of courtship behaviour in pampas deer has been reported by Verdier <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B83">83</abbr></abbrgrp> in free-ranging <it>O. bezoarticus uruguayensis </it>in Rocha, Uruguay. He described seven courtship behavioural units, which are defined in Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>. We have also observed that after a low stretch (Fig. <figr fid="F8">8A</figr>), the male lies down near the female and may stay there for several hours, either as a kind of "guard" to determine receptiveness of the female or to keep other males away. Similar behaviours have been reported in mouflons (<it>Ovis aries</it>) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B84">84</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <tbl id="T1">
               <title>
                  <p>Table 1</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Courtship behavioural units observed in pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>).</p>
               </caption>
               <tblbdy cols="2">
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Behavioural unit</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Behaviour in the male</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="2">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Low stretch</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Walks toward the female with his head and neck stretched, the head held in a low position, a few centimetres above the ground, maintaining a distance of 2&#8211;10 m</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Ostentation</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Stands immobile in front of the female, sometimes walking a few steps toward her. The neck is held erect and the head horizontal, generally rotated to one side. The chin is held up high.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Anogenital sniffing</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Pushes its face into the female's anogenital region.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Chivying</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Marches towards the female, with the neck in a normal position.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Chivying and nodding</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Similar to chivying, but sporadically moves the head and neck up and down, keeping them still for no longer than 1 second</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Smelling urine</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Smells and puts the nose in the female's urine</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Flehmen</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>The head is raised, the external nares are drawn back, and the upper lip is curled back.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
               </tblbdy>
            </tbl>
            <fig id="F8">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 8</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Courtship behavioural events in pampas deer: A) low stretch; B) ostentation; C) anogenital sniffing; and D) smelling urine</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Courtship behavioural events in pampas deer: A) low stretch; B) ostentation; C) anogenital sniffing; and D) smelling urine.</b> See detailed descriptions of each behaviour in Table 1.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1751-0147-50-16-8"/>
            </fig>
            <p>Likewise, we have observed ostentation (Fig. <figr fid="F8">8B</figr>), which is always performed &lt; 3 m away from the female, and which also includes the alternate movements of the front legs. These are flexed slowly, kept flexed for a few seconds in the air and then extended briskly, thumping the soil violently. This movement is performed alternately with both front legs. Interestingly, Thomas et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B85">85</abbr></abbrgrp> define a similar behavioural unit, the "hard look", in the repertoire of agonistic behavioural units of the white-tailed deer.</p>
            <p>Anogenital sniffing (Fig. <figr fid="F8">8C</figr>) in mouflons has also been described as "sniffing the rear" <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B84">84</abbr></abbrgrp> while in domestic sheep it has been described as nudging <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B86">86</abbr></abbrgrp>. Chivying is performed at a greater distance than the low stretch. Clutton-Brock et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr></abbrgrp> describe this behaviour in red deer. We have recently confirmed Fr&#228;drich's observations <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr></abbrgrp> that males may vocalize simultaneously.</p>
            <p>We also confirmed Fr&#228;drich's <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr></abbrgrp> observation that the male smells and puts his nose in the female's urine (smell urine, Fig. <figr fid="F8">8D</figr>). In some cases we saw males gently rubbing the soil where the female had just urinated. Furthermore, some males hastily approach the female when she adopts the urinating position and will wet their nose with the urine before it reaches the soil.</p>
            <p>Figure <figr fid="F9">9</figr> shows the frequency at which each behaviour was observed by Verdier <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B83">83</abbr></abbrgrp>, the low stretch and ostentation being the most common behaviours. As has been observed in other ruminants <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B86">86</abbr></abbrgrp>, smelling urine and flehmen are the only behaviours that are highly associated.</p>
            <fig id="F9">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 9</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Frequency of each courtship behavioural unit in pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>)</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Frequency of each courtship behavioural unit in pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>).</b> LS = low stretch; Os = ostentation; AGS = anogenital sniffing; Ch = chivying; ChN = chivying and nodding; SU = smelling urine; F = flehmen. See detailed descriptions of each behaviour in Table 1. Redrawn from Verdier [83].</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1751-0147-50-16-9"/>
            </fig>
            <p>Vos et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B87">87</abbr></abbrgrp> state that masturbation by deer has not been recorded. However, recently at the ECFA we observed one adult male masturbation, with strong pelvic movements during approximately 5 seconds while chivying. This occurred in January. The male was kept in a pen with cycling females. However, masturbation did not end in visible ejaculation.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Mating</p>
            </st>
            <p>In our observations, the male walks toward the female with his head and neck stretched, with the head in a low position (low stretch), and begins to smell the female's anogenital region. Next, the male approaches laterally, beginning with tongue movements, similar to the ram's nudge <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B86">86</abbr></abbrgrp>. The female displays proceptive behaviours, such as nibbling the male's ear, or walks towards the male, and lifts and moves her tail near the male's nose, inviting the male to discover her vulva. Finally the male mounts and mates her. We have also observed incomplete and lateral mounting of receptive females by males. This has also been reported in other deer species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr></abbrgrp>, mouflon <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B84">84</abbr></abbrgrp> and sheep <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B86">86</abbr></abbrgrp>. However, we observed this only once in one sexually inexperienced male. During mating, the male displays strong and quick movements during 3&#8211;4 seconds. We observed six to ten pelvic movements. After mating, the male has a short refractory period during which the female may walk a few metres away while the male stays immobilized. However, the female then lifts her tail and exposes the vulva lips contracting, repeatedly exposing her clitoris.</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Chemical communication and male reproduction</p>
            </st>
            <p>Social behaviour including reproduction is profoundly influenced by chemical signals in ruminants, including deer [for a review, see Gosling, <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B88">88</abbr></abbrgrp>]. We have attempted to summarize the sources of chemical signals, and some of the most common behaviours used to transmit or receive them. The most common secreting pathways reported for deer are urine, faeces, saliva, and secretions from specialized cutaneous glands <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B88">88</abbr></abbrgrp>. Scent marks are commonly placed in the environment, on their own bodies, or on the body of other individuals. Different strategies have been reported in different deer species.</p>
            <p>The forms and possible functions of the cutaneous glands in <it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus </it>from Uruguay have been described by Langguth &amp; Jackson <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B89">89</abbr></abbrgrp>. The preorbital gland is situated in a depression of the external face, near the lacrimal bone, and extends forward from the anterior corner of the eye. The tarsal gland is located on the inner side of the tarsal joint, and the interdigital gland is located between the first phalanges of the two principal toes in the hindfoot. The forehead and the bases of the antlers are stiffer than the surrounding areas, and furthermore, the sites corresponding to the bucks' antler stumps or bases are marked in females by two white dots <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B89">89</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <p>Both sexes have the above mentioned glands but only males display marking activity. An adult male in hard antler has an outer orifice of the preorbital gland with a diameter of 1.5 cm. The substances secreted by the cutaneous glands are left on a wide variety of substrates. Pampas deer males exhibit marking behaviour associated with each of the three cutaneous glands. Verdier <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B83">83</abbr></abbrgrp> describes the marking behaviour of pampas deer both in the wild and in captivity (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>).</p>
            <tbl id="T2">
               <title>
                  <p>Table 2</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Marking behavioural units displayed by pampas deer males (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>).</p>
               </caption>
               <tblbdy cols="2">
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Behavioural unit</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Behaviour in the male</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="2">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Frontal marking</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Brisk swinging head motions, either lateral or vertical, rubbing both antlers, simultaneously or alternately. Frequently performed with the tail raised, showing the perineal region.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Rubbing</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>A beating and twisting of the brush and small limbs, initially in the stripping of the velvet and consequently, although perhaps incidentally, in the polishing of the antlers</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Antler trashing</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>The chafing of the basal antler parts against the trunks of small trees</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Pre-orbital marking</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Stands with the neck stretched, pressing the gland against an object, with short and energetic up and down movements</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Front leg marking</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Performed with the neck slightly below the shoulder height, scratching the ground with the front hooves, frequently alternating the hooves</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
               </tblbdy>
            </tbl>
            <p>Frontal marking is the most frequently observed marking in both adult and juvenile males. The places chosen to perform this behaviour are tree branches, bushes or grass tufts (Fig. <figr fid="F10">10</figr>). The movements are generally performed in series, every few seconds or every few steps. Frontal marking may be associated with marking with front legs <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B83">83</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <fig id="F10">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 10</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Frontal marking on A) tufts of grass; and B) tree branches</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p>
                     <b>Frontal marking on A) tufts of grass; and B) tree branches.</b>
                  </p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1751-0147-50-16-10"/>
            </fig>
            <p>Rubbing has also been described in mule deer [Lindsdale &amp; Tomich, 1953, cited by de Vos et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B87">87</abbr></abbrgrp>], red deer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr></abbrgrp> and pampas deer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B76">76</abbr></abbrgrp>. Altmann <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B90">90</abbr></abbrgrp> states that the rubbing of antlers by elk is an erotic stimulus. Darling <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B91">91</abbr></abbrgrp> notes that among European red deer, antler rubbing is an auto-erotic stimulus. Denniston <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B92">92</abbr></abbrgrp> considers antler rubbing and masturbation a part of the sex drive response complex of moose.</p>
            <p>Antler trashing, which has been observed only in adult males in hard antler <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B76">76</abbr></abbrgrp>, results in very visible barkless zones in trees, approximately 40 cm long <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr></abbrgrp>. Mock fights with vegetation are often associated with antler thrashing. White-tailed deer bucks expend much energy during the rut in fighting any object viewed as an obstacle or opponent <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B93">93</abbr></abbrgrp>. Linsdale &amp; Tomich <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B94">94</abbr></abbrgrp> propose that these fights are practice runs for real contests, but they also state that the rubbing of antlers "may have become so formalized that it is often engaged in for its own sake as the actual contests may be".</p>
            <p>Preorbital marking is performed with the preorbital gland. The sequence of movements is repeated immediately with the contralateral gland. Free-ranging pampas deer generally mark tree branches <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B83">83</abbr></abbrgrp>, but our observations at the ECFA have been that males normally perform this behaviour less frequently than other types of marking behaviour. Pampas deer at the ECFA have also been seen to mark cement columns.</p>
            <p>Front leg marking was seen by us in only one adult male with velvet antlers. Both semi-captive (our own observations) and free-ranging pampas deer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B83">83</abbr></abbrgrp> perform this behaviour with the tail up and curved over the back. The male then frequently urinates the recently marked ground, resulting in a patch of ground without grass (50 cm), which is, however, not easily visible.</p>
            <p>Males kept in a pen with only females have also been observed challenging males separated from their pen by a 1 m wide corridor by performing frontal marking on bushes and small branches, and frontal marking on the wire fence right in front of the place where another male would be standing. Similar behaviour has been reported for reindeer [Espmark, 1964, referred to in de Vos et al., <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B87">87</abbr></abbrgrp>].</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Male agonistic behaviour</p>
            </st>
            <p>Pampas deer have an established social hierarchy, maintained by aggressive-submissive behaviours <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B76">76</abbr></abbrgrp>. Agonistic interactions, such as scent marking, increase in number during the pre-rut period. In confined male groups, individuals maintain distances of > 5 m from each other, except during feeding time, a period during which an important number of agonistic interactions are observed. This limit may correspond to the "critical distance" of approximately 3 m described by Altman <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B95">95</abbr></abbrgrp> in elk (<it>Cervus canadensis</it>) and moose (<it>Alces alces</it>).</p>
            <p>At the ECFA, we observed similar behavioural events to those described in the wild to dominate other individuals (Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>).</p>
            <tbl id="T3">
               <title>
                  <p>Table 3</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Agonistic behaviours displayed by pampas deer males (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>)</p>
               </caption>
               <tblbdy cols="2">
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Behavioural unit</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Description of the interaction</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c cspan="2">
                        <hr/>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Glare</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>The dominant male stands with the neck held erect and looks steadily at the other individual, with the ears occasionally dropped flat against the neck.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Antler present threat</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>The antler points in the direction of the other individual, with the ears back and dropped. May be part of sparring.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Nose-touching contact</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>With the neck erect, the noses of two males make contact.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Shaking head</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Dominant males raise their neck and shake their head.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Head low threat and chase</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>The head and the neck are lowered, with the ears held back.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Strike and barge</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Using its forefoot the male strikes another individual on the shoulder or the croup.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
                  <r>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>Sparring and fighting</p>
                     </c>
                     <c ca="left">
                        <p>These behaviours are not easily distinguishable.</p>
                     </c>
                  </r>
               </tblbdy>
            </tbl>
            <p>Glare (Fig. <figr fid="F11">11A</figr>) leads to submission without physical interaction. Consequently, it is commonly observed in established groups of males, although it has also been observed towards females and young males. Antler present threat is presented in Fig. <figr fid="F11">11B</figr>. Nose-touching contact (Fig. <figr fid="F11">11C</figr>) is commonly observed in most social interactions. It has been suggested that it is related to individual identification <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B76">76</abbr><abbr bid="B89">89</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
            <fig id="F11">
               <title>
                  <p>Figure 11</p>
               </title>
               <caption>
                  <p>Male agonistic behaviours in male pampas deer(<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>): A) glare; B) the antler presentthreat; C) nose-touching; D) locking of antlers; E) pursuing asubordinate individual</p>
               </caption>
               <text>
                  <p><b>Male agonistic behaviours in male pampas deer(<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>): A) glare; B) the antler presentthreat; C) nose-touching; D) locking of antlers; E) pursuing asubordinate individual. </b>See detailed descriptions of each behaviour in Table 3.</p>
               </text>
               <graphic file="1751-0147-50-16-11"/>
            </fig>
            <p>While the shaking of the head is similar to what has been observed in <it>Odocoileus hemionus crooki </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B96">96</abbr></abbrgrp>, the head low threat and chase is similar to the "hard look" reported in white-tailed deer (<it>Odocoileus virginalis texanus</it>) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B85">85</abbr></abbrgrp>. The last is followed on some occasions by short chases. As in the wild <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B76">76</abbr></abbrgrp> it is the most common agonistic event we have observed in semi-captivity.</p>
            <p>We observed that when one male strikes and barges, the submissive individual quickly escapes. In red deer, two males confronting each other have been observed to stroke with their forefoot while standing on their hind legs. Although we have not observed this behaviour in adult males, we have in a young hand-reared male (5 months) toward other unfamiliar young males. Jackson <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B76">76</abbr></abbrgrp> also saw it in one hand-reared animal toward its owner.</p>
            <p>Sparring and fighting have often been observed between young males, and not so frequently between adult males. While in young males these behaviours have been observed in both animals in hard antler and animals with velvet antlers, in adult males they are more common in individuals in hard antler. Jackson <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B76">76</abbr></abbrgrp> also observed that young males commonly initiate sparring and contests against mature males. According to Verdier <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B83">83</abbr></abbrgrp>, fights can be divided up into three stages: onset, course, and conclusion. During the onset the aggressor approaches a rival, generally glaring at it and nose-touching. Jackson <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B76">76</abbr></abbrgrp> observed that males might then gently touch each other's antler tips, before locking their antlers, to push back and forth, twisting and turning for up to 3 minutes (Fig. <figr fid="F11">11D</figr>). During this period males look steadily at each other, and push steadily. After the 3 minutes, it is common to stop pushing, and glance or nouse-touch again before beginning another period of locking antlers, pushing back and forth, twisting and turning again. Sometimes fights end when males unlock their antlers and one of them or both walk away from each other. Bianchini &amp; Perez <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B78">78</abbr></abbrgrp> and Jackson <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B76">76</abbr></abbrgrp> report that submissive individuals are not pursued, although we have occasionally observed persecutions (Fig. <figr fid="F11">11E</figr>). Commonly, individuals do not engage again, but walk slowly 1 m apart for 10&#8211;30 m, presenting their antlers and sparring <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B76">76</abbr></abbrgrp>, similarly to reports in <it>Dama dama </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B97">97</abbr></abbrgrp> and <it>Cervus elaphus </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr></abbrgrp>. We have also observed walking similar to that described by Jackson <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B76">76</abbr></abbrgrp> between males that were not in direct contact, but separated by fencing. Sometimes several males challenge the same or nearby bucks. As reported for fallow deer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B97">97</abbr></abbrgrp>, it is frequently difficult to determine who is the winner of the fight [<abbrgrp><abbr bid="B83">83</abbr></abbrgrp>, and our own observations].</p>
            <p>Commonly submissive individuals just walk away, with the ears back and up, or expose the neck <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B76">76</abbr></abbrgrp>. Fr&#228;drich <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr></abbrgrp> observed the head lowered and slow walking away from the aggressor. Possibly the lack of physical contact in most of behavioural units as well as the small number of combats observed between adult males contribute to "a lower frequency of fight" and "decrease [the] risk of serious injury", as reported by McElliot et al. [cited by Bartos, <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B97">97</abbr></abbrgrp>] in <it>Dama dama</it>.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Reproductive technologies: semen collection and cryopreservation</p>
         </st>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Semen collection</p>
            </st>
            <p>South American deer populations are dwindling. Reproductive biotechnology techniques such as artificial insemination (AI), in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer have been used effectively in animal conservation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B98">98</abbr><abbr bid="B99">99</abbr></abbrgrp> and specifically in other wild deer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B100">100</abbr></abbrgrp>. Semen from pampas deer has been collected by electro-ejaculation, artificial vagina and vaginal collection.</p>
            <p>Electro-ejaculation is undoubtedly the method of choice in untamed animals and it is the most frequently used semen collection technique in deer <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B82">82</abbr></abbrgrp>. Jaczewski &amp; Jasiorowski <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B101">101</abbr></abbrgrp> used electro-ejaculation for semen collection in <it>Cervus elaphus </it>(using a voltage of 4.5&#8211;31.5 V, amperage 0.2&#8211;0.7 A). Semen collection from free-ranging <it>O. bezoarticus leucogaster </it>males was performed successfully by Duarte et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B102">102</abbr></abbrgrp>. Duarte &amp; Garcia <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B103">103</abbr></abbrgrp> successfully used the equipment habitually used for bulls with an electrode modified to fit pampas deer anatomy. This technique was used for <it>Ozotoceros</it>, <it>Mazama </it>and <it>Blastocerus</it>. Animals should always be sedated (1&#8211;2 mg/kg xylazine and 5 mg/kg ketamine) either intramuscularly or intravenously. The males were stimulated with 250&#8211;750 mA, resting every 3 seconds until ten stimuli had been performed. After a 1&#8211;2-minute rest the procedure was repeated. No more than three stimulation sessions were performed per collection <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B103">103</abbr></abbrgrp>. The semen volume obtained is very small (0.1&#8211;0.7 mL) but the concentration is high (mean 1,500 &#215; 10<sup>6 </sup>spermatozoa (spz)/mL; maximum 3,000 &#215; 10<sup>6 </sup>spz/mL). No more than one weekly collection should be performed.</p>
            <p>In pampas deer we obtained semen from anaesthetized males with electro-ejaculation using electric discharges during 3 seconds and resting for 2 seconds. Series of ten stimulating periods were repeated, beginning with 1 v and ending with 6 v. Males ejaculated 0.1&#8211;0.45 mL during 5 and 6-v series. In some occasions, ejaculates were obtained without erection.</p>
            <p>Pampas deer semen has also been obtained with an artificial sheep vagina <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B103">103</abbr></abbrgrp>. More frequent collections can be performed using this method. However, this technique can only be used in tame, trained animals. Stuffed animals can be used, with female urine poured onto the dorsal region. In very tame animals with strong imprinting, i.e. animals that have been raised by humans since birth, collection can be performed on the operator's knee <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B103">103</abbr></abbrgrp>. A doll fitted with an artificial vagina is used for shy animals. The doll is left inside the deer's enclosure and the operator just waits for the animal to copulate <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B103">103</abbr></abbrgrp> as described for red deer by Krziwinski &amp; Bobek <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B104">104</abbr></abbrgrp>. Soto et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B105">105</abbr></abbrgrp> collected semen on the knee of an operator from one <it>O. bezoarticus celer </it>male born in captivity. They used "Danish-type" artificial vaginas at a temperature of 42&#176;C. Ejaculated volumes using this method are very small (0.1&#8211;0.25 mL).</p>
            <p>In Santa Fe, Argentina, semen in anaesthetized males was obtained by electro-ejaculation, using increasing pulse series from 2 V, until ejaculation. Overall, semen was obtained seven times from five different males (three times during mid-winter, twice in early autumn, once during early summer and once during mid-spring). One or two fractions were obtained in all animals. Volumes varied from 0.1 mL to 0.6 mL. The percentage of motile spermatozoa ranged from 20% to 70%, and concentration varied from 15 to 1,235 million/mL. Total spermatozoa/ejaculate varied from 34 to 130 millions (A.J. Sestelo, N.L. J&#225;come, M.A. Rivolta, V. Astore, personal communication).</p>
         </sec>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Semen evaluation</p>
            </st>
            <p>Semen should be evaluated after collection. Semen volume is measured in a scaled centrifuge tube with a conical end. An aliquot should be taken for formol-saline fixation, in order to measure sperm concentration at a dilution of 1:200. Several diluents have been used for cervids. Haigh et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B106">106</abbr></abbrgrp> tried three diluents made up of citrate and egg yolk (20%), skimmed milk (2%) and promide-D (vegetable protein) to freeze and thaw <it>Cervus elaphus </it>semen. Diluents were tested with or without adding 0.2% sodium ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid (EDTA). Glycerol as cryoprotectant and antibiotics to impair bacterial growth were added to all diluents. The EDTA-added diluent proved to be best, both because of a lower loss of sperm motility and because of fewer acrosomal defects after thawing. Monfort et al. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B107">107</abbr></abbrgrp> working with Eld's deer (<it>Cervus eldi thamin</it>) frozen-thawed spermatozoa using a diluent made up of 1.2 g hydroxymethyl methyl-2-amino ethane sulphonic acid (TES-n-tris), 1.2 g hydroxymethylaminomethane (Tris), 1.6 g glucose, 1.6 g fructose, 1.5 mL amino-sodium-lauryl sulphate, 20 mL egg yolk, 0.04 g penicillin G and 0.1 g streptomycin in 100 mL diluent. The decrement in semen motility after freezing-thawing was only 20&#8211;30%. Duarte &amp; Garcia <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B108">108</abbr></abbrgrp> used Tris-citric acid buffer (4.54% Tris, 2.6% citric acid, 0.75% glucose) with 2.25% egg yolk and 6% glycerol in several Brazilian deer species, including <it>O. bezoarticus bezoarticus</it>. However, better results were achieved later by the same authors by adding 10% egg yolk. According to Duarte &amp; Garcia <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B102">102</abbr></abbrgrp>, glycerol should preferably be added to the diluted semen during the final dilution, to minimize sperm damage before freezing due to the cryoprotectant. Prior to semen freezing, diluted semen is chilled to 4&#176;C by placing the collection tube in a vessel containing warm water (35&#176;C) and storing it at 4&#176;C for 4 hours. Semen is then stored in 0.5 mL paillettes, each containing 50 &#215; 10<sup>6 </sup>spermatozoa. Chilled semen is placed over liquid N<sub>2 </sub>vapour (2&#8211;3 cm over N<sub>2 </sub>level) for 10 minutes before immersion into N<sub>2</sub>.</p>
            <p>After copulation of a hind in heat, the doe is sedated and semen is collected with a Pasteur pipette. To minimize semen loss, an artificial mucosa should be introduced into the hind's vagina <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B101">101</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
         </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Conclusions and future directions of research</p>
         </st>
         <p>The pampas deer has received less attention that it should, considering the limited distribution of the species. In particular, important aspects of the reproduction of this species are unknown. In this review we have summarized mainly anatomical and behavioural information on the species. Some of this information has already been published and studied systematically while some is preliminary evidence or describes single observations that require more research. However, one aspect that is mostly unexplored is the physiology of reproduction in pampas deer. Our research group aims to investigate all aspects of pampas deer reproduction so that this knowledge and the available modern reproductive techniques can be used to improve the situation of the species. Management and the use of appropriate techniques have been shown to be effective in improving reproductive rate in other ruminants. In this case, a strategy of conservation of pampas deer should include this type of intervention. Therefore, there is significant need to continue doing research in this species. Basic information such as the age at which pampas deer reach puberty, first oestrous cycle, and the gestational length have not been systematically determined. The availability of this type of information is critical to enable us to manage and intervene to improve reproductive rates in captive animals and the condition of the species for conservation in wild populations.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>List of abbreviations</p>
         </st>
         <p>CITES: Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. ECFA: Estaci&#243;n de Cr&#237;a de Fauna Aut&#243;ctona; Native Fauna Breeding Station. UICN: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Competing interests</p>
         </st>
         <p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>Authors' contributions</p>
         </st>
         <p>RU began and coordinated the research performed at the ECFA, was SG-P's and MV's advisor, drafted the manuscript, and co-ordinated the writing and editing of the ms. SG-P wrote the courtship and mating behaviour sections, helped directly in writing the sections on agonistic behaviour, marking, and birthing and the early postpartum period, as well as the maternal behaviour and early fawn development sections. SG-P also collected important unpublished data included in the manuscript. AB wrote the sections dealing with seasonal reproductive patterns and reproductive technologies, i.e. semen collection and cryopreservation. AB also reviewed and helped with most sections, and collected unpublished data. MV wrote the section on male agonistic behaviour, and the chemical communication and male reproduction sections, and helped writing the courtship and mating behaviour, birth and early postpartum, and maternal behaviour and early fawn development sections, as well as collecting important unpublished data included in the manuscript. DO wrote the basic text on birthing and the early postpartum period, and on maternal behaviour and early fawn development. DO also helped to draft, and reviewed, the manuscript. WP collected the original data related to anatomical sections, and helped with the editing of the manuscript.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <ack>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Acknowledgements</p>
            </st>
            <p>The authors would like to acknowledge Uruguay Tabar&#233; Gonz&#225;lez-Sierra, who as Director of the ECFA recorded important information regarding pampas deer biology over several years; Drs Mary Araujo and Intendencia Municipal de Maldonado, for actively improving our research activities at the ECFA; Miguel Coloma, Jorge Gil, Enrique Plaza del Casta&#241;o, Adrian Sestelo, Tatiana Morales, Fernando Fumagalli, Leticia de la Fuente, Marcela Canabal, Carmen Rossini, Luc&#237;a Delbene, Pedro Martino and Norma Gonz&#225;lez, who helped with different experiments performed at the ECFA; Adri&#225;n Sestelo, Norberto Luis J&#225;come, Miguel Angel Rivolta and Vanesa Astore, for providing us with unpublished information obtained by Estaci&#243;n Zool&#243;gica Experimental Granja la Esmeralda, Jard&#237;n Zool&#243;gico de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires and Fundaci&#243;n Bioandina Argentina (Argentina) and the Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (Spain). Financial support was provided by the CSIC (Universidad de la Rep&#250;blica, Montevideo, Uruguay), Intendencia Municipal de Maldonado (Uruguay), and CIDEC (Facultad de Veterinaria, Uruguay).</p>
         </sec>
      </ack>
      <refgrp>
         <bibl id="B1">
            <title>
               <p>Ecology and status of pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>) in the Argentinean pampas and Uruguay</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jackson</snm>
                  <fnm>JE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Langguth</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Biology and management of the Cervidae</source>
            <publisher>Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press</publisher>
            <editor>Wemmer C</editor>
            <pubdate>1987</pubdate>
            <fpage>402</fpage>
            <lpage>409</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B2">
            <title>
               <p>Sobre la sistem&#225;tica del venado y su variaci&#243;n individual y geogr&#225;fica</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cabrera</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Rev Museo La Plata</source>
            <pubdate>1943</pubdate>
            <volume>3</volume>
            <fpage>5</fpage>
            <lpage>41</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B3">
            <title>
               <p>Pampas deer in Uruguay</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jackson</snm>
                  <fnm>JE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Landa</snm>
                  <fnm>P</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Langguth</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Oryx</source>
            <pubdate>1980</pubdate>
            <volume>15</volume>
            <fpage>267</fpage>
            <lpage>272</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B4">
            <title>
               <p>The IUCN mammal red data book</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Thornback</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jenkins</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <publisher>Part II. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland</publisher>
            <pubdate>1982</pubdate>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B5">
            <title>
               <p>Pampas deer conservation with respect to habitat loss and protected area considerations in San Luis, Argentina</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Demar&#237;a</snm>
                  <fnm>MR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>McShea</snm>
                  <fnm>WJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Koy</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Maceira</snm>
                  <fnm>NO</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Biol Cons</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>115</volume>
            <fpage>121</fpage>
            <lpage>130</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00101-0</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B6">
            <title>
               <p>The food of pampas deer <it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus celer </it>in relation to its conservation in relict natural grassland in Argentina</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jackson</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Giullieti</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Biol Cons</source>
            <pubdate>1988</pubdate>
            <volume>45</volume>
            <fpage>1</fpage>
            <lpage>10</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0006-3207(88)90048-1</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B7">
            <title>
               <p>Status and distribution of threatened deer species in South America. Report to SSC/IUCN deer group</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Junguis</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>World Wildlife Fund Yearbook</source>
            <publisher>Gland, Switzerland</publisher>
            <pubdate>1975</pubdate>
            <volume>76</volume>
            <fpage>203</fpage>
            <lpage>217</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B8">
            <title>
               <p>Situaci&#243;n de la poblaci&#243;n del venado de las pampas en la Bahia Samboromb&#243;n</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Vila</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Beade</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <publisher>Bolet&#237;n T&#233;cnico 37, Fundaci&#243;n Vida Silvestre, Buenos Aires, Argentina</publisher>
            <pubdate>1997</pubdate>
            <fpage>30</fpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9007742</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B9">
            <title>
               <p>El venado de las pampas en Corrientes, diagn&#243;stico de su estado de conservaci&#243;n y propuestas de manejo: situaci&#243;n cr&#237;tica</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Parera</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Moreno</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <publisher>Fundaci&#243;n Vida Silvestre Argentina</publisher>
            <pubdate>2000</pubdate>
            <fpage>40</fpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B10">
            <title>
               <p>Distribution and abundance of the pampas deer in San Luis province, Argentina</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dellafiore</snm>
                  <fnm>CM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Demar&#237;a</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Maceira</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bucher</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Neotrop Mammal</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>10</volume>
            <fpage>41</fpage>
            <lpage>47</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B11">
            <title>
               <p>Distribuci&#243;n y conservaci&#243;n del venado de las pampas (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus leucogaster</it>) en el norte de Santa Fe, Argentina</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pautasso</snm>
                  <fnm>AA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pe&#241;a</snm>
                  <fnm>MI</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mastropaolo</snm>
                  <fnm>JM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Moggia</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Neotrop Mammal</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <fpage>64</fpage>
            <lpage>69</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B12">
            <title>
               <p>O veado campeiro (Mammalia, Cervidae)</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Carvalho</snm>
                  <fnm>CT</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <publisher>Boletim Tecnico 7. Secretaria de Estado dos Negocios da Agricultura, Coordenadoria da Pesquisa de Recursos Naturais, Insituto Florestal, Brasil</publisher>
            <pubdate>1973</pubdate>
            <fpage>9</fpage>
            <lpage>22</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B13">
            <title>
               <p>Redescoberta do veado-campeiro, <it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>, no estado do Paran&#225; &#8211; Brasil</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>G&#243;ss-Braga</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <publisher>II Taller de C&#233;rvidos del Uruguay, May, Montevideo, Uruguay</publisher>
            <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B14">
            <title>
               <p>Dieta y solapamiento de la poblaci&#243;n de venado de campo "Los Ajos", (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus </it>L 1958) (Artiodactyla: Cervidae)</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cosse</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>M.Sc. Thesis</source>
            <publisher>PEDECIBA, Montevideo, Uruguay</publisher>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B15">
            <title>
               <p>Situaci&#243;n poblacional del venado de campo en el Uruguay</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gonz&#225;lez</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Population and habitat viability assessment for the pampas deer Ozotoceros bezoarticus</source>
            <publisher>Briefing book, October, Rocha, Uruguay</publisher>
            <pubdate>1993</pubdate>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B16">
            <title>
               <p>Situaci&#243;n de la especie en Bolivia</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tarifa</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Population and habitat viability assessment for the pampas deer Ozotoceros bezoarticus</source>
            <publisher>Briefing book, Rocha, Uruguay</publisher>
            <pubdate>1993</pubdate>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B17">
            <title>
               <p>CITES, 2008. Appendices I, II and III. Valid from 12 February 2008</p>
            </title>
            <url>http://www.cites.org/eng/app/appendices.shtml</url>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B18">
            <title>
               <p>UICN, 2008. The iucn Red List of Threatened Species. <it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus ssp. Uruguayensis</it></p>
            </title>
            <url>http://www.iucnredlist.org/search/details.php/40778/all</url>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B19">
            <title>
               <p>Reproduction in a semi-captive herd of pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>)</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ungerfeld</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gonz&#225;lez-Sierra</snm>
                  <fnm>UT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Piaggio</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Wildlife Biology</source>
            <inpress/>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B20">
            <title>
               <p>
                  <it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>
               </p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jackson</snm>
                  <fnm>JE</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Mamm Species</source>
            <pubdate>1987</pubdate>
            <volume>295</volume>
            <fpage>1</fpage>
            <lpage>5</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/3504043</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B21">
            <title>
               <p>Conservation genetics of the endangered Pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>)</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gonz&#225;lez</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Maldonado</snm>
                  <fnm>G</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Leonard</snm>
                  <fnm>JA</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Vil&#224;</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Barbanti-Duarte</snm>
                  <fnm>JM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Merino</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Brum-Zorrilla</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wayne</snm>
                  <fnm>RK</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Molecular Ecology</source>
            <pubdate>1998</pubdate>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <fpage>47</fpage>
            <lpage>56</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00303.x</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9465416</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B22">
            <title>
               <p>Morphometric differentiation of endangered Pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>), with descriptions of new subspecies from Uruguay</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gonz&#225;lez</snm>
                  <fnm>S</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Alvarez-Val&#237;n</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Maldonado</snm>
                  <fnm>JE</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Journal of Mammalogy</source>
            <pubdate>2002</pubdate>
            <volume>83</volume>
            <fpage>1127</fpage>
            <lpage>1140</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083&lt;1127:MDOEPD>2.0.CO;2</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B23">
            <title>
               <p>Antler size and weight in a herd of pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>)</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ungerfeld</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bielli</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gonz&#225;lez-Pensado</snm>
                  <fnm>SX</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Villagr&#225;n</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gonz&#225;lez-Sierra</snm>
                  <fnm>UT</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Mammal Biol</source>
            <inpress/>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B24">
            <title>
               <p>International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature (I.C.V.G.A.N.): Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria (NAV)</p>
            </title>
            <edition>5</edition>
            <url>http://www.wava-amav.org/Downloads/nav_2005.pdf</url>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B25">
            <title>
               <p>The reproductive tract and the placenta and membranes of Pere David's deer (<it>Elaphurus davidianus </it>Milne Edwards)</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Harrison</snm>
                  <fnm>RJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Hamilton</snm>
                  <fnm>WJ</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Anat</source>
            <pubdate>1952</pubdate>
            <volume>86</volume>
            <fpage>203</fpage>
            <lpage>225</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="pmcid">1273772</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">14946073</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B26">
            <title>
               <p>Real-time physiological responses of red deer to translocations</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Waas</snm>
                  <fnm>JR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ingram</snm>
                  <fnm>JR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Matthews</snm>
                  <fnm>LR</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Journal of Wildlife Management</source>
            <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
            <volume>63</volume>
            <fpage>1152</fpage>
            <lpage>1162</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/3802833</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B27">
            <title>
               <p>Erfahrungen mit der zucht von pampashirschen (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>)</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gonz&#225;lez Sierra</snm>
                  <fnm>UT</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Bongo (Berlin)</source>
            <pubdate>1985</pubdate>
            <volume>9</volume>
            <fpage>33</fpage>
            <lpage>44</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B28">
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Redford</snm>
                  <fnm>KH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Eisenberg</snm>
                  <fnm>JF</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Mammals of the Neotropics, The Southern Cone: Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay</source>
            <publisher>The University of Chicago Press, London</publisher>
            <pubdate>1992</pubdate>
            <volume>2</volume>
            <fpage>245</fpage>
            <lpage>252</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B29">
            <title>
               <p>Gestation length in red deer: genetically determined or environmentally controlled?</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Asher</snm>
                  <fnm>GW</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Reproduction in domestic ruminants VI</source>
            <publisher>UK: Nottingham University Press</publisher>
            <editor>Juengel JL, Murria JF, Smith MF</editor>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B30">
            <title>
               <p>Parturitional, early maternal, and neonatal behavior in penned white-tailed deer</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Townsend</snm>
                  <fnm>TW</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Baisley</snm>
                  <fnm>ED</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Mammal</source>
            <pubdate>1975</pubdate>
            <volume>56</volume>
            <fpage>347</fpage>
            <lpage>62</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/1379365</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">1141773</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B31">
            <title>
               <p>Reproductive management of fallow deer</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mulley</snm>
                  <fnm>RC</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Current Therapy in Large Animal Theriogenology</source>
            <publisher>Missouri: Saunders, Elsevier</publisher>
            <editor>Youngquist RS, Threlfall WR</editor>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>Chapter 129</volume>
            <fpage>952</fpage>
            <lpage>965</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B32">
            <title>
               <p>Reproductive management of farmed deer and wapiti</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wilson</snm>
                  <fnm>PR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Haigh</snm>
                  <fnm>JC</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Current Therapy in Large Animal Theriogenology</source>
            <publisher>Missouri: Saunders, Elsevier</publisher>
            <editor>Youngquist RS, Threlfall WR</editor>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>Chapter 128</volume>
            <fpage>943</fpage>
            <lpage>952</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B33">
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Clutton-Brock</snm>
                  <fnm>TH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Guinness</snm>
                  <fnm>FE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Albon</snm>
                  <fnm>SD</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Red Deer Behavior and Ecology of two sexes</source>
            <publisher>Schaller GB, The University of Chicago Press</publisher>
            <pubdate>1982</pubdate>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B34">
            <title>
               <p>Reproductive behavior of red deer and wapiti</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Asher</snm>
                  <fnm>GW</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Haigh</snm>
                  <fnm>JC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wilson</snm>
                  <fnm>PR</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Current Therapy in Large Animal Theriogenology</source>
            <publisher>Missouri: Saunders, Elsevier</publisher>
            <editor>Youngquist RS, Threlfall WR</editor>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <volume>Chapter 127</volume>
            <fpage>937</fpage>
            <lpage>942</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B35">
            <title>
               <p>The pampas deer (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>) in central Brazil</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Redford</snm>
                  <fnm>KH</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Biology and management of the Cervidae</source>
            <publisher>Washington DC, USA: Smithsonian Inst. Press</publisher>
            <editor>Wemmer C</editor>
            <pubdate>1987</pubdate>
            <fpage>410</fpage>
            <lpage>414</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B36">
            <title>
               <p>Relevamiento de &#225;reas con venado de campo en el este del Departamento de Salto</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cravino</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Notas del Departamento de Fauna. N&#176; 1/2003</source>
            <publisher>Uruguay. Publicaci&#243;n en pagina web oficial del MGAP</publisher>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <url>http://www.mgap.gub.uy/renare/AreasProtegidasyFauna/Fauna/Fauna.htm</url>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B37">
            <title>
               <p>Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth sex ratios in red deer</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Clutton-Brock</snm>
                  <fnm>TH</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Albon</snm>
                  <fnm>SD</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Guiness</snm>
                  <fnm>FE</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Nature</source>
            <pubdate>1984</pubdate>
            <volume>308</volume>
            <fpage>358</fpage>
            <lpage>360</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/308358a0</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B38">
            <title>
               <p>Timing and synchrony of births in roe deer</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gaillard</snm>
                  <fnm>JM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Delorme</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jullien</snm>
                  <fnm>JM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Tatin</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Mammal</source>
            <pubdate>1993</pubdate>
            <volume>74</volume>
            <fpage>738</fpage>
            <lpage>744</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/1382296</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B39">
            <title>
               <p>Beobachtungen am pampas hirsch, <it>Blastoceros bezoarticus </it>(Linneus 1758)</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fradrich</snm>
                  <fnm>H</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Zool Garten</source>
            <pubdate>1981</pubdate>
            <volume>51</volume>
            <fpage>7</fpage>
            <lpage>32</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B40">
            <title>
               <p>Mother-Young recognition in an ungulate hider species: A unidirectional Process</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Torriani</snm>
                  <fnm>MVG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Vannoni</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>McElligott</snm>
                  <fnm>AG</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>The Am Ntl</source>
            <pubdate>2006</pubdate>
            <volume>168</volume>
            <fpage>412</fpage>
            <lpage>420</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1086/506971</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B41">
            <title>
               <p>Effects of social organization, age and aggressive behaviour on allosuckling in wild fallow deer</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ekvall</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Anim Behav</source>
            <pubdate>1998</pubdate>
            <volume>56</volume>
            <fpage>695</fpage>
            <lpage>703</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/anbe.1998.0825</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">9784219</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B42">
            <title>
               <p>Mother-offspring bonding in farmed red deer: accuracy of visual observation verified by DNA analysis</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Vankov&#225;</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Barto&#353;</snm>
                  <fnm>L</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>C&#237;zov&#225;-Schr&#246;ffelov&#225;</snm>
                  <fnm>D</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nespor</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Jandurov&#225;</snm>
                  <fnm>O</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Appl Anim Behav Sci</source>
            <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
            <volume>73</volume>
            <fpage>157</fpage>
            <lpage>165</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00125-3</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">11358612</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B43">
            <title>
               <p>Reproductive anatomy and physiology of male wapiti and red deer</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Haigh</snm>
                  <fnm>JC</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Current Therapy in Large Animal Theriogenology</source>
            <publisher>Saunders</publisher>
            <editor>Youngquist R, Threlfall W</editor>
            <pubdate>2007</pubdate>
            <fpage>932</fpage>
            <lpage>936</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B44">
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Whitehead</snm>
                  <fnm>GK</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Deer of the world</source>
            <publisher>London: Constable</publisher>
            <pubdate>1972</pubdate>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B45">
            <title>
               <p>Lekking in fallow deer: just a matter of density?</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Apollonio</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Ethology Ecol Evol</source>
            <pubdate>1989</pubdate>
            <volume>1</volume>
            <fpage>291</fpage>
            <lpage>294</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B46">
            <title>
               <p>Timing and synchrony of parturition in Alaskan caribou</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Adams</snm>
                  <fnm>LG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Dale</snm>
                  <fnm>BW</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Mammal</source>
            <pubdate>1998</pubdate>
            <volume>79</volume>
            <fpage>287</fpage>
            <lpage>294</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/1382865</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B47">
            <title>
               <p>Timing and synchrony of parturition in Alaskan moose: long-term versus proximal effects of climate</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bowyer</snm>
                  <fnm>RT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Van Ballenberghe</snm>
                  <fnm>V</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Kie</snm>
                  <fnm>JG</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Mammal</source>
            <pubdate>1998</pubdate>
            <volume>79</volume>
            <fpage>1332</fpage>
            <lpage>1344</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/1383025</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B48">
            <title>
               <p>Synchrony between caribou calving and plant phenology in depredated and non-depredated populations</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Post</snm>
                  <fnm>E</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>B&#248;ving</snm>
                  <fnm>PS</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pedersen</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>MacArthur</snm>
                  <fnm>MA</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Can J Zool</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>81</volume>
            <fpage>1709</fpage>
            <lpage>1714</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1139/z03-172</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B49">
            <title>
               <p>Timing of parturition and lactation in southern mule deer</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bowyer</snm>
                  <fnm>RT</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Mammal</source>
            <pubdate>1991</pubdate>
            <volume>72</volume>
            <fpage>138</fpage>
            <lpage>145</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/1381988</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B50">
            <title>
               <p>Circannual inter-relationships among reproductive hormones, gross morphometry, behaviour, ejaculate characteristics and testicular histology in Eld's deer stags (<it>Cervus eldi thamin</it>)</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Monfort</snm>
                  <fnm>SL</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Brown</snm>
                  <fnm>JL</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bush</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wood</snm>
                  <fnm>TC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wemmer</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Vargas</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Williamson</snm>
                  <fnm>LR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Montali</snm>
                  <fnm>RJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Wildt</snm>
                  <fnm>DE</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Journal of Reproduction and Fertility</source>
            <pubdate>1993</pubdate>
            <volume>98</volume>
            <fpage>471</fpage>
            <lpage>480</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B51">
            <title>
               <p>The temporal estrous patterns of female alpine musk deer in captivity</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>XiuXiang</snm>
                  <fnm>M</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>QiSen</snm>
                  <fnm>Y</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Lin</snm>
                  <fnm>X</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>ZuoJian</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>YingWen</snm>
                  <fnm>J</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>PeiMing</snm>
                  <fnm>W</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Appl Anim Behav Sci</source>
            <pubdate>2003</pubdate>
            <volume>82</volume>
            <fpage>75</fpage>
            <lpage>85</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00013-3</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B52">
            <title>
               <p>Gestation periods in the Pere David's deer (<it>Elaphurus davidianus</it>): evidence for embryonic diapause or delayed development</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Brinklow</snm>
                  <fnm>BR</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Loudon</snm>
                  <fnm>AS</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Reprod Fertil Dev</source>
            <pubdate>1993</pubdate>
            <volume>5</volume>
            <fpage>567</fpage>
            <lpage>575</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1071/RD9930567</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid">8190909</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B53">
            <title>
               <p>Factors controlling lambing period of Dall's sheep</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bunnel</snm>
                  <fnm>FL</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Can J Zool</source>
            <pubdate>1980</pubdate>
            <volume>58</volume>
            <fpage>1027</fpage>
            <lpage>1031</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid">7427797</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B54">
            <title>
               <p>Timing and synchrony of ovulation in red deer constrained by short Northern summers</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Langvatn</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mysterud</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stenseth</snm>
                  <fnm>NC</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Yoccoz</snm>
                  <fnm>NG</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>The American Naturalist</source>
            <pubdate>2004</pubdate>
            <volume>163</volume>
            <fpage>763</fpage>
            <lpage>772</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubidlist>
                  <pubid idtype="doi">10.1086/383594</pubid>
                  <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15122493</pubid>
               </pubidlist>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B55">
            <title>
               <p>Calving success of female caribou in relation to body weight</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Cameron</snm>
                  <fnm>RD</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Smith</snm>
                  <fnm>WT</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Fancy</snm>
                  <fnm>SG</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gerhart</snm>
                  <fnm>KL</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>White</snm>
                  <fnm>RG</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Can J Zool</source>
            <pubdate>1993</pubdate>
            <volume>71</volume>
            <fpage>480</fpage>
            <lpage>486</lpage>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B56">
            <title>
               <p>Climate predictability and breeding phenology in red deer: timing and synchrony of rutting and calving in Norway and France</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Loe</snm>
                  <fnm>LE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Bonenfant</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Mysterud</snm>
                  <fnm>A</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Gaillard</snm>
                  <fnm>JM</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Langvatn</snm>
                  <fnm>R</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Klein</snm>
                  <fnm>F</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Calenge</snm>
                  <fnm>C</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ergon</snm>
                  <fnm>T</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Pettorelli</snm>
                  <fnm>N</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Stensseth</snm>
                  <fnm>NC</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Journal of Animal Ecology</source>
            <pubdate>2005</pubdate>
            <volume>74</volume>
            <fpage>579</fpage>
            <lpage>588</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00987.x</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B57">
            <title>
               <p>Induced early estrus in penned white tailed does</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Verme</snm>
                  <fnm>LJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ozoga</snm>
                  <fnm>JJ</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Nellist</snm>
                  <fnm>JT</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>J Wildl Manage</source>
            <pubdate>1987</pubdate>
            <volume>51</volume>
            <fpage>54</fpage>
            <lpage>56</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.2307/3801629</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B58">
            <title>
               <p>Timing of estrus in fallow deer is adjusted to the age of available mates</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Komers</snm>
                  <fnm>PE</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Birgersson</snm>
                  <fnm>B</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
                  <snm>Ekvall</snm>
                  <fnm>K</fnm>
               </au>
            </aug>
            <source>Am Nat</source>
            <pubdate>1999</pubdate>
            <volume>153</volume>
            <fpage>431</fpage>
            <lpage>436</lpage>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="doi">10.1086/303185</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B59">
            <title>
               <p>Veado-Campeiro (<it>Ozotoceros bezoarticus</it>)</p>
            </title>
            <aug>
               <au>
                  <snm>Merino</snm>
                  <fnm>ML</fnm>
               </au>
               <au>
     